Re: dired-jump keybinding and autoload

[Lennart Borgman]

On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Drew Adams <address@hidden> wrote:
>> More important: C-x C-j is reserved for Emacs internal use if I
>> understand it correctly.
>
> No, I don't see that anywhere.  Why would that be the case?
>
>> See (info "(elisp) Key Binding Conventions"). I might be wrong since
>> that page does not mention C-x, but I think it should.
>
> You ask us to visit that node, but there is nothing there supporting your 
> claim
> - which you subsequently admit.  Just what would you like us to look for in 
> that
> node?


Please do not exaggerate. I want you to look at the keys reserved for
major modes!


>> That C-x today happens to be a bad choice (because of CUA) is another
>> thing.
>
> Sure is.  Unrelated, irrelevant, unimportant.


Why? This just looks like a rant.


> C-x today, yesterday, and tomorrow is an _excellent_ choice as an Emacs key
> prefix.  It is easy-to-hand.  And it has been conventional in Emacs (and even
> beyond) for over 30 years.


We have different opinions. Saying that it is an excellent choice is
an exaggeration. It is not an excellent choice in my opinion.


> Saying that C-x is a bad choice because of CUA is like saying that driving on
> the right side of the road is a bad choice because of Britain (or Japan or
> India... - no flames please) - http://www.brianlucas.ca/roadside/.  When in
> CUA-land, follow the rules of the CUA road, but don't expect folks across the
> border to do the same.


That would be nice, but would not that mean that all key bindings
should be changed when cua-mode is on? Or do you think CUA land is
outside of Emacs?


> There is absolutely nothing wrong with users or 3rd-party code using the C-x
> prefix.  Or else there is a new restriction/convention that I am not aware of.
>
> The conventions stated in `(elisp) Key Binding Conventions' are long-standing
> and pretty carefully thought out.  There are enough such restrictions, IMO.  I
> do not support adding C-x to any list of bindings "reserved for Emacs internal
> use".


All C-x bindings are absent from that page. I guess you do not mean
that a major mode could use any key bindings starting with C-x?

I have assumed that C-x is not mentioned because it is reserved for
Emacs. If not, then it should be mentioned on that info page to
clarify things.

But my opinion is very clear: Recommend that 3rd party libraries
should not use C-x as a prefix key.