[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: dired-jump keybinding and autoload
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: dired-jump keybinding and autoload |
Date: |
Mon, 24 May 2010 09:46:13 -0700 |
> > Since `C-x C-j' is almost a duplicate of `C-x d' (they both
> > switch to the Dired buffer), maybe a better key for dired-jump
> > would be `C-x C-d'.
>
> Maybe `C-x D'?
If you do not object to `C-x D' simply because it is on the `C-x' prefix, how
can there be any objection to `C-x C-j' on the same grounds?
So it sounds to me like there is no objection to using `C-x C-j'.
And Juri's "finding a better non-conflicting key" is a non-problem:
`C-x C-j' is _not_ a conflicting key in any way. It is a free global binding
that does not conflict with any bindings made by any code distributed with
Emacs.
- RE: dired-jump keybinding and autoload, (continued)
- Re: dired-jump keybinding and autoload, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/05/23
- Re: dired-jump keybinding and autoload, Lennart Borgman, 2010/05/23
- Re: dired-jump keybinding and autoload, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/05/24
- Re: dired-jump keybinding and autoload, Leo, 2010/05/23
- Re: dired-jump keybinding and autoload, Juri Linkov, 2010/05/24
- Re: dired-jump keybinding and autoload, Lennart Borgman, 2010/05/24
- RE: dired-jump keybinding and autoload,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: dired-jump keybinding and autoload, Lennart Borgman, 2010/05/24
- RE: dired-jump keybinding and autoload, Drew Adams, 2010/05/24
Re: dired-jump keybinding and autoload, Miles Bader, 2010/05/24