[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [PATCH] (Or "question"...) isearch-kill-found
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: [PATCH] (Or "question"...) isearch-kill-found |
Date: |
Mon, 31 May 2010 13:04:37 -0700 |
> > The alternative that I proposed does not affect any keys that exit
> > isearch - you exit it normally, any way you want. What it does do
> > is leave the mark-setting on or off until you toggle it, with
> > `C-SPC' during isearch.
>
> Eh.... it *does* affect a key that exits isearch: C-SPC.
Yes. I should have said only that you need not exit specially to get the marking
behavior.
> Of course I also dislike it because it adds a state. As for simply
> providing a variable to change the behavior (without a key-binding to
> change it), that's another solution, indeed. Maybe not a bad one.
Why is not having a key to toggle the variable better?
It is the variable that "adds a state", not the toggle key.
Re: [PATCH] (Or "question"...) isearch-kill-found, Juri Linkov, 2010/05/30
- Re: [PATCH] (Or "question"...) isearch-kill-found, Chong Yidong, 2010/05/31
- Re: [PATCH] (Or "question"...) isearch-kill-found, Lennart Borgman, 2010/05/31
- Re: [PATCH] (Or "question"...) isearch-kill-found, Stefan Monnier, 2010/05/31
- Re: [PATCH] (Or "question"...) isearch-kill-found, Lennart Borgman, 2010/05/31
- RE: [PATCH] (Or "question"...) isearch-kill-found, Drew Adams, 2010/05/31
- Re: [PATCH] (Or "question"...) isearch-kill-found, Stefan Monnier, 2010/05/31
- RE: [PATCH] (Or "question"...) isearch-kill-found,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: [PATCH] (Or "question"...) isearch-kill-found, Stefan Monnier, 2010/05/31
Re: [PATCH] (Or "question"...) isearch-kill-found, Juri Linkov, 2010/05/31