[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Jun 2010 20:15:07 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> Ah, OK. So what I was observing (no difference between C-f and <right>
> in L2R paragraphs) is the wrong behavior. I was indeed
> misunderstanding.
No, what you're observing is the desired behavior. All it shows is:
Actually, the arrow keys don't do "visual motion".
which was pointed out to David in response to his statement:
Since we opened that can of worms already by making C-f/C-b do
logical motion as opposed to the arrow keys doing visual motion,
So, no we didn't open that can of worms. And please let's stop the
thread here.
Stefan
- Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p, (continued)
- Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p, Stefan Monnier, 2010/06/07
- Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/06/07
- Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p, David Kastrup, 2010/06/07
- Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/06/07
- Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p, Andreas Schwab, 2010/06/07
- Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/06/07
- Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p, Stefan Monnier, 2010/06/07
- Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/06/07
- Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p, Davis Herring, 2010/06/07
- Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/06/07
- Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p, Uday S Reddy, 2010/06/08
- Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p, Stefan Monnier, 2010/06/08
- Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p, Uday S Reddy, 2010/06/08
- Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/06/07
- Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p, Miles Bader, 2010/06/08
Re: Performance, Stefan Monnier, 2010/06/07
Re: Performance, Kenichi Handa, 2010/06/10