Re: support for git commit --amend/--signoff

[Stefan Monnier]

>> If we only consider Git's and DaRCS's forms of amend, I'd say that the
>> "Amend:" header might be a good approach, and that it should specify the
>> revision/patch that's amended.  So for Git, you could have a command
>> that inserts "Amend: <SHA-1>" and then the backend could check that the
>> SHA-1 is the right one (which would avoid accidental use).

> No idea about Darcs, but `git commit --amend' always changes the tip of
> the current branch, you can't specify another commit to amend;

I know that (and DaRCS doesn't have such a limitation).

> so the above would not be useful in this case (same for --signoff).

It is not useful but it is needed because an empty header is normally
the same as no header, so just "Amend:" can't be enough, we'd have to
put something there.  I suggested a SHA-1 just because Dan though there
was a risk of people writing the header by mistake.


        Stefan