Re: buildbot setup

[Ted Zlatanov]

On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:39:23 +0200 Lennart Borgman <address@hidden> wrote: 

LB> 2010/6/30 Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden>:
>> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 00:11:11 +0200 Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
>> 
SM> So we could tell people to use <someplace> to checkout the latest
SM> successfully tested version of the code.
>> 
>> I'm not crazy about using a branch to announce a build success.  Are

LB> Can't it be just a command to checkout the successfully successfully
LB> tested revision?

We could use a tag.  But as I mentioned there's a lot of complexity to a
"success" especially if we care about more than one platform and set of
libraries.

>> I think it's better and less confusing to simply announce failures
>> through another channel, perhaps as bugs.  Then silence will be the
>> default, which is good for everyone, and builds will not have any
>> effect on the repository.

LB> Can't it be combined?

Sorry, can you explain?  I can't figure out what you mean.

Ted