Re: split up process.c [was: Re: Changes in process.c]

[Dan Nicolaescu]

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

>> Cc: address@hidden
>> From: Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden>
>> Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 14:52:39 -0400
>> 
>> Why don't we split the part for supporting MS-DOS into a different
>> file: process-no-subprocesses.c (or some better name)
>> 
>> That makes the file easier to read, less clunky, and problems easier
>> to catch with a simple grep.
>
> It will still leave two implementations of the same code.  

That's better than what we currently have.

There's already a precedent for multiple implementations for the same function: 
all of x_*