[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Symbol's function definition is void: x-register-dnd-atom
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Symbol's function definition is void: x-register-dnd-atom |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:02:33 +0300 |
> From: Ken Raeburn <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 16:33:59 -0400
>
> > With or without "-l loadup" on the command line?
> >
> > Without it, you will miss a lot of features which you are accustomed
> > to have.
>
> Óscar's original message said he's using CANNOT_DUMP. Unless something's
> been broken since I last tried it, loading loadup.el is part of the program
> startup in that mode, as long as "--no-loadup"/"-nl" isn't given; it doesn't
> need to be specified on the command line. If passing "-l loadup" makes
> things work better, there's probably a bug in there somewhere...
In case it wasn't clear, I was trying to say that there should be no
need to futz with CANNOT_DUMP, especially since almost no platforms
use it nowadays, and consequently few people are familiar with what it
does to help Óscar if something doesn't work.
- Re: Symbol's function definition is void: x-register-dnd-atom, (continued)
Re: Symbol's function definition is void: x-register-dnd-atom, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/07/25
Re: Symbol's function definition is void: x-register-dnd-atom, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/07/25