emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why <config.h> and not "config.h" ?


From: Jan Djärv
Subject: Re: Why <config.h> and not "config.h" ?
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:19:59 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.0.6

2010-07-28 10:04, immanuel litzroth skrev:
No, it does not.  The search for include files with<>  does not start in the
current directory, where as for "" it does.  That is the only difference.
  If the headers are system headers or not is not the difference.

All this stuff is completely implementation dependent.

That is what ANSI-C says, yes. But do you know of any implementation that differs from what I said above? I do not.

        Jan D.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]