Re: Why <config.h> and not "config.h" ?

[Óscar Fuentes]

Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> writes:

> Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Maybe is my hideous English, but as explained on my original message <>
>> is giving me problems with some tool.
>
> The only difference between <> and "" is that the latter first searches
> in the same directory as the containing file, before any -I directories.
> Since for an out-of-src build config.h is never found in the source
> directory this should not make any difference in practice.

Precisely, it seems that Emacs is using <> because some people ends
having a config.h on the source directory, and even they defend this
practice as a convenience.