Re: Buffer names are sometimes read-only objects in daemonized emacs

[Lennart Borgman]

On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Stefan Monnier
<address@hidden> wrote:
>> No no, you got me wrong.  I just meant the docstring of `buffer-name'
>> (and any other function that returns some thing whose modification would
>> have undesired, non-obvious side-effects) should explicitly state that
>> modifying that returned string will indeed modify the buffer name.
>
> Rather, `aset' should warn that modifying strings is evil and dangerous.
>
>
>        Stefan "whose aset refuses to do it"


When will this aset be grown up enough to play outside of home?