[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why <config.h> and not "config.h" ?
|
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
|
Subject: |
Re: Why <config.h> and not "config.h" ? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 01 Aug 2010 18:31:37 +0900 |
Eli Zaretskii writes:
> > From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden>
> > Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:21:29 +0900
> > Cc: address@hidden, Miles Bader <address@hidden>
> >
> > bzr brunch emacs
>
> Does it also make coffee?
wideload:~ 18:30$ bzr help coffee
bzr: ERROR: No help could be found for 'coffee'.
wideload:~ 18:31$
Apparently not.
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Why <config.h> and not "config.h" ?,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=