[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BZR and the bootstrap
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: BZR and the bootstrap |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Aug 2010 20:57:07 +0900 |
Óscar Fuentes writes:
> IIRC, lightweight checkouts contain information for testing if the
> file is modified or missing from the file system, which provides a
> local `bzr status' operation. For anything else it needs to contact
> upstream.
That may be true, but the rest of that help message strongly implies
that bzr can't even do a status in a lightweight checkout without
contacting the branch:
Normal checkouts can perform common operations like
diff and status without such access[...].
- BZR and the bootstrap, Angelo Graziosi, 2010/08/08
- Re: BZR and the bootstrap, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/08
- Re: BZR and the bootstrap, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/08/08
- Re: BZR and the bootstrap, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/09
- Re: BZR and the bootstrap, Angelo Graziosi, 2010/08/09
- Re: BZR and the bootstrap, Angelo Graziosi, 2010/08/09
- Re: BZR and the bootstrap, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/08/09
- Re: BZR and the bootstrap, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/09
- Re: BZR and the bootstrap, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/08/09
- Re: BZR and the bootstrap,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: BZR and the bootstrap, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/09
- Re: BZR and the bootstrap, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/09
- Re: BZR and the bootstrap, Angelo Graziosi, 2010/08/09
- Re: BZR and the bootstrap, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/08/09
Re: BZR and the bootstrap, Johan Bockgård, 2010/08/09
Re: BZR and the bootstrap, Stefan Monnier, 2010/08/10