[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: document package.el
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: document package.el |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Aug 2010 15:13:51 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> "Chong" == Chong Yidong <address@hidden> writes:
I'll reply to the rest of the patch reviews later, whenever I can get
some time to update the patch.
Tom> + A multi-file package is just a @file{.tar} file.
Chong> BTW, this is off-topic, but I've been meaning to ask why you don't use
Chong> .tar.gz files. Is the bandwidth difference insignificant?
I haven't tried to measure it.
I wanted to have minimal dependencies on the user's side, so I didn't
want to rely on a decompressor. With a recent enough Emacs, you don't
even need a 'tar' program, due to tar-untar-buffer.
Some sort of optional compression would be fine. It seems like this
could be handled transparently by the URL package, though, in
conjunction with a server that knew how to serve compressed files
automatically.
Tom
- Re: document package.el, (continued)
Re: document package.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/08
Re: document package.el, Chong Yidong, 2010/08/08
Re: document package.el, Uday S Reddy, 2010/08/17