|
From: | Angelo Graziosi |
Subject: | Re: BZR and the bootstrap |
Date: | Mon, 09 Aug 2010 23:47:15 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; it; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 |
Il 09/08/2010 19.11, Eli Zaretskii ha scritto:
From: "Stephen J. Turnbull"<address@hidden> Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 15:57:42 +0900 Cc: Angelo Graziosi<address@hidden>, address@hidden It's penny-wise and pound-foolish for anybody who is unfamiliar with Bazaar to use lightweight checkouts. Occasional contributors and beta testers should invest in a full branch, bound or not depending on their use cases.If it turns out that this is how "bzr status" is supposed to work in lightweight checkouts, perhaps VC should refrain from calling that command when it detects a lightweight checkout.
Unless someone beats me, I would continue to do what I have always done after the migration to BZR system:
$ bzr checkout --lightweight http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/r/emacs/trunk emacs-trunk
to be updated with 'bzr up'. Now, if I want avoiding BZR to be called while bootstrapping, I will do: $ rsync -av --exclude=.* --delete emacs-trunk/ emacs/ using 'emacs/' as source tree.Omitting '--lightweight' is good too, but a file '.bzr' of 200M is annoying if one wants to save the bzr tree in a tar-ball archive (to be used on other systems, for example).
Ciao, Angelo.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |