Re: Emacs Wrestling Match: lisp.h vs rest of the includes

[Stefan Monnier]

> The problem with these changes is that they represent moving things in
> the opposite direction of what I think would be right: from the
> includes to lisp.h (not that I'm moving anything to lisp.h, just
> keeping the declaration on lisp.h and removing the other one).

Indeed, we generally want to move them to the specific .h that
corresponds to where they're defined.  Why did you choose to keep the
lisp.h version rather than the other?


        Stefan