Re: Locks on the Bzr repository

[Jan Djärv]

Uday S Reddy skrev 2010-08-21 14.51:
> Jan Djärv writes:
>
> > > You are arguing both ways, it seems to me.
> >
> > I'm arguing that push doesn't buy you anything w.r.t. to speed when sending
> > changes to Savannah.  If by both ways you mean "push is slow" and "commit is
> > slow" you are correct.  We can just say "bzr is slow" and be done with it.
>
> If you use unbound branches, push is slow but commit is not slow.

Duh.  I'm only talking about when stuff goes to Savannah.  I know committing 
locally is much faster, I do it all the time.

> Separating push from commit helps you in that, you can do push less
> often.

No it don't.  When a bug fix is done, or a feature is done, I want it to go to 
Savannah.  Push doesn't help here, when it is time, it is time.

> By arguing "both ways", I mean that you want to argue that bound
> branches are better.

You are putting words in my mouth.  I only said for the same amount of data to 
be sent upstream, push and commit is equally slow.

        Jan D.