[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bzr send workflow
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: bzr send workflow |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:14:25 +0900 |
Bojan Nikolic writes:
> My idea was that in the first instance the bundles would be merged
> by (a select group of) people.
Sure, and who do you mean by "people"? Presumably Stefan, Yidong, et
al. I don't think that having Stefan merge Eli's changes is efficient
use of anybody's time. Use of bundles might make contribution by
occasional contributors more efficient, but I don't think it addresses
the problem that some core developers are bottlenecking on bzr/Savannah.
> To reiterate the main benefit though: accepting "bzr send" bundles
> means that people on even the slowest connections can contribute
> easily and efficiently. I've used these satisfactorily over slow
> GPRS connections.
AFAIK Stefan et al are already as willing to accept merge directives
as any other form of patch. It wouldn't hurt to advertise that
option, of course. But I really don't think it's a solution to the
current bottleneck.
- Re: bzr send workflow, (continued)
- Re: bzr send workflow, Andy Wingo, 2010/08/25
- Re: bzr send workflow, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/08/25
- Re: bzr send workflow, Chong Yidong, 2010/08/26
- Re: bzr send workflow, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/08/26
- Re: bzr send workflow, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/27
- Re: bzr send workflow, Wojciech Meyer, 2010/08/27
bzr send workflow (Was: Locks on the Bzr repository), Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/22
Re: bzr send workflow, Bojan Nikolic, 2010/08/22
Re: bzr send workflow,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
Re: bzr send workflow, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/23