emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Building Emacs-trunk with gcc >= 4.5.1 and libelf installed


From: Angelo Graziosi
Subject: Re: Building Emacs-trunk with gcc >= 4.5.1 and libelf installed
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:05:20 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; it; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2

Yaakov ,
thanks for clarifications and suggestions. I hope someone on the Emacs list can recipie and apply them appropriately.

Emacs guys,
the simplest workaround I found to fix the issue was to add

#undef SVR4

in src/s/cygwin.h

Thanks,
Angelo.


Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 01:31 +0200, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
Trying to build Emacs-trunk on Cygwin with GCC >= 4.5.1, I have found a
problem if also the package 'libelf0' is installed.
[snip]
and the following test in 'configure' script is true:
[snip]
i.e. SVR4 is _defined_. But... 'src/xfaces.c' includes indirectly via
'/usr/include/X11/Xos.h' the header '/usr/include/X11/Xarch.h', which has:
[snip]
i.e. finding SVR4 defined, it searches for 'byteorder.h' in
'/usr/include/sys' and not in '/usr/include/asm', where it lives (*as on
GNU/Linux*[1]), and this leads to the above failure.

This is coming from autoconf's AC_FUNC_GETLOADAVG, which tries to find
several different getloadavg(3) implementations (which Cygwin doesn't
provide), otherwise it points to an AC_LIBOBJ from gnulib.  On Solaris,
the gnulib getloadavg uses kvm_open(3) and friends, and libkvm requires
libelf, hence the check for the latter.

AFAICS the proper solution is, in _AC_LIBOBJ_GETLOADAVG:

if test $ac_have_func = no && test "$ac_cv_lib_elf_elf_begin" = yes;
then
  ac_have_func=yes
  AC_DEFINE(SVR4, 1, [Define to 1 on System V Release 4.])
fi

to add << && test "$ac_cv_lib_kvm_kvm_open" = yes >> to the conditional.

In the meantime, since libelf isn't needed elsewhere in emacs, an easy
workaround is to add "ac_cv_lib_elf_elf_begin=no" to CYGCONF_ARGS.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]