[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Structural regular expressions
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Structural regular expressions |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Sep 2010 11:23:11 +0900 |
"Drew Adams" <address@hidden> writes:
> That's the real point, I believe: the paper touts the use of regexps
> to divide text into chunks that match - chunks that are not
> necessarily lines, in order to then act on those chunks in some way.
Not a good base, I think -- regexps are not really powerful enough to do
the job well.
-Miles
--
Happiness, n. An agreeable sensation arising from contemplating the misery of
another.
- Re: Structural regular expressions, (continued)
- Re: Structural regular expressions, Davis Herring, 2010/09/09
- Re: Structural regular expressions, Lennart Borgman, 2010/09/09
- Re: Structural regular expressions, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/10
- Re: Structural regular expressions, Richard Stallman, 2010/09/10
- Re: Structural regular expressions, David House, 2010/09/10
- Message not available
- Re: Structural regular expressions, Tom, 2010/09/10
- RE: Structural regular expressions, Drew Adams, 2010/09/10
- Re: Structural regular expressions,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Structural regular expressions, Tom, 2010/09/11
- Re: Structural regular expressions, Wojciech Meyer, 2010/09/11
- Re: Structural regular expressions, tomas, 2010/09/11
- RE: Structural regular expressions, Drew Adams, 2010/09/11
- Re: Structural regular expressions, Richard Stallman, 2010/09/11
- Re: Structural regular expressions, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/12
- Re: Structural regular expressions, Lennart Borgman, 2010/09/12
- RE: Structural regular expressions, Drew Adams, 2010/09/12
- Re: Structural regular expressions, Lennart Borgman, 2010/09/12
- RE: Structural regular expressions, Drew Adams, 2010/09/12