[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Google modules integration
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Google modules integration |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Sep 2010 03:18:54 -0400 |
> IANAL, but it seems quite fishy. Assume you argue that you used the
> APIs without reading that.
You really don't want to go down that road without a lawyer's advice.
An argument of exactly the same form applies to the GPL.
These two issues are totally different, in legal terms. The GNU GPL
simply exercises copyright. Those "terms of service" try to make
a contract.
- Re: Google modules integration, (continued)
- Re: Google modules integration, Jambunathan K, 2010/09/09
- Re: Google modules integration, Glenn Morris, 2010/09/10
- Re: Google modules integration, Richard Stallman, 2010/09/11
- Re: Google modules integration, Glenn Morris, 2010/09/11
- Re: Google modules integration, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/09/11
- Re: Google modules integration, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/09/11
- Re: Google modules integration, Jambunathan K, 2010/09/12
- Re: Google modules integration, Jeff Clough, 2010/09/12
- Re: Google modules integration, Richard Stallman, 2010/09/12
- Re: Google modules integration, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/09/12
- Re: Google modules integration,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Google modules integration, Richard Stallman, 2010/09/12
- Re: Google modules integration, Glenn Morris, 2010/09/12
- Re: Google modules integration, Richard Stallman, 2010/09/13
- Re: Google modules integration, Jambunathan K, 2010/09/13
- Re: Google modules integration, Richard Stallman, 2010/09/14
- Re: Google modules integration, Julien Danjou, 2010/09/10
- Re: Google modules integration, Glenn Morris, 2010/09/10
- Re: Google modules integration, Richard Stallman, 2010/09/11
- Re: Google modules integration, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/11
- Re: Google modules integration, Richard Stallman, 2010/09/12