[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: e and pi
From: |
Wojciech Meyer |
Subject: |
Re: e and pi |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:44:20 +0100 |
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Stefan Monnier
<address@hidden> wrote:
> PS: Oddly enough, SML has a similar trap where "o" is predefined as the
> function-composition operator and "op" is a rarely used reserved
> keyword, and I think everyone agrees by now that these were
> bad decisions.
Yes but in Standard ML type checker most likely caught it before program run
(at least if the signatures are different `o' would have (a' -> b') ->
(c' -> a') -> (c' -> b')).
Wojciech
- Re: e and pi, (continued)
Re: e and pi, Helmut Eller, 2010/09/17
Re: e and pi, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/17
Re: e and pi,
Wojciech Meyer <=
Re: e and pi, Chong Yidong, 2010/09/17
Re: e and pi, Wojciech Meyer, 2010/09/17
Re: e and pi, Helmut Eller, 2010/09/17
Re: e and pi, Glenn Morris, 2010/09/17
Re: e and pi, Glenn Morris, 2010/09/17
Re: e and pi, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/18
Re: e and pi, Helmut Eller, 2010/09/18
Re: e and pi, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/18
Re: e and pi, Helmut Eller, 2010/09/18
Re: e and pi, David Kastrup, 2010/09/18