[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: e and pi
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: e and pi |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Sep 2010 13:07:38 +0200 |
> From: Helmut Eller <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 12:21:02 +0200
>
> > What you describe as a big surprise is actually known to every C/C++
> > programmer: some names are "reserved by the implementation" and should
> > not be used by the application code.
>
> I don't see how that could be relevant here.
It's relevant because such limitations are common in other languages.
- Re: e and pi, (continued)
- Re: e and pi, Wojciech Meyer, 2010/09/17
- Re: e and pi, Chong Yidong, 2010/09/17
- Re: e and pi, Wojciech Meyer, 2010/09/17
- Re: e and pi, Helmut Eller, 2010/09/17
- Re: e and pi, Glenn Morris, 2010/09/17
- Re: e and pi, Glenn Morris, 2010/09/17
- Re: e and pi, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Helmut Eller, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: e and pi, Helmut Eller, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, David Kastrup, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Andreas Schwab, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/09/18
- RE: e and pi, Drew Adams, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/17
- Re: e and pi, Chong Yidong, 2010/09/17
- Re: e and pi, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Chong Yidong, 2010/09/18