Re: C-x C-x

[David Kastrup]

"Andrew W. Nosenko" <address@hidden> writes:

> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:49, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>> "Andrew W. Nosenko" <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> About stop activating region by C-x C-x.  I'm (of course) unable to
>>> speak for anyone who uses t-m-m, but for me C-x C-x, same as C-x C-x
>>> C-x C-x is intentionally thing for activating region.  And usual goal
>>> is to send this region to the external filter (as in C-x C-x C-u M-|).
>>
>> This works perfectly fine without activating the region first.
>
> May be :-) But I'm personally feel self very uncomfortable when don't
> see what going to be changed (the region in this concrete case).

C-x C-x will show you the other end of the region just fine without
needing to activate it.

-- 
David Kastrup