Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen<address@hidden> writes:
Leo<address@hidden> writes:
Yeah I like that too. After seeing two of its outputs, I quickly noticed
the pattern and just create some short two-liners to access the tree.
Nice. :-)
Perhaps Stefan's idea of just naming the functions `libxml-parse-*' was
the best to avoid the compatibility discussion.
Having two xml parsers that provide slightly different outputs, even
though they do the exact same thing, is a problem regardless of what
their names are.