Re: EMACS_INT cleanup

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 21:34:29 +0200
> 
> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > Lisp_Object
> > oblookup (Lisp_Object obarray, register const char *ptr, int size, int 
> > size_byte)
> >
> > The last parameter there is an EMACS_INT.  Should I change oblookup to
> > take EMACS_INT parameters, in case we want to intern a 2.1GB long
> > string? 
> 
> I mean, it sounds nonsensical, but 1) it makes it compile without any
> other warnings, and 2) if you've said (setq a (buffer-string)) on a big
> buffer and then happen to (intern a), you don't want a segfault, do you?

I see no harm in having both size and size_byte be EMACS_INT.