Re: EMACS_INT cleanup

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

>> void
>> message3 (Lisp_Object m, int nbytes, int multibyte)
>> 
>> So we can only do a message that's 2GB big?  Well, OK, but is that a
>> problem? 
>
> Why bother thinking?  Why not just replace int with EMACS_INT?

I'm just querying the list about what they think the general policy for
this should be.  I (personally) think all this should be fixed, so that
the gcc warnings would actually be useful, but since -Wall is in the
state it's in, I was assuming that there might be a reason for that
state.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  address@hidden * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen