[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Intervals crash
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: Intervals crash |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Sep 2010 03:54:55 +0900 |
Eli Zaretskii writes:
> And what makes you think I need a paternalistic lecture about
> demerits of unsigned data types? You already had your chance once,
> and I let it go. Why do you think I deserve it twice in a row?
I don't think you deserve it. I think Emacs deserves the benefit of
XEmacs's experience, and you were rebutting with bogus claims about
what Emacs "needs". It would be a shame if that discourages others
from improving Emacs, that's all.
- Re: Intervals crash, (continued)
Re: Intervals crash, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/23
- Re: Intervals crash, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/09/24
- Re: Intervals crash, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/24
- Re: Intervals crash, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/09/24
- Re: Intervals crash, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/24
- Re: Intervals crash, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/09/25
- Re: Intervals crash, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/25
- Re: Intervals crash,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: Intervals crash, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/25
- Re: Intervals crash, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/09/26
- Re: Intervals crash, Miles Bader, 2010/09/26
- Re: Intervals crash, David Kastrup, 2010/09/26
- Re: Intervals crash, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/09/27
- Re: Intervals crash, David Kastrup, 2010/09/27
- Re: Intervals crash, Jan Djärv, 2010/09/27
- Re: Intervals crash, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/27
- Re: Intervals crash, David Kastrup, 2010/09/27
- Re: Intervals crash, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/27