Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 94, Issue 89

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

> Ideally, we'd have two XINT-style macros, one that returns an int and
> one that returns an EMACS_INT.  E.g. for chars, we'd use the `int'
> version since chars use less than 32 bits.

Makes sense.  The other macro could just be a wrapper around XINT that
coerces to int.

What would it be called?  XIINT?  Eek.  Uhm.  XNINT?  (For "not long
int.")  :-)  Ok, I have nothing.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  address@hidden * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen