Re: imagemagick support on W32

[joakim]

Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden> writes:

> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 14:38,  <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> On w32 something different seems to happen, but no real effort seems to
>> be done to avoid errors if the desired library isnt there. I might be
>> wrong.
>
> Run-time or compile-time?

Run-time

> If the library support is compiled in,
> failing to load the desired library at run time is not an error; the
> image type will just be unavailable.

Ok.

>     Juanma

-- 
Joakim Verona