[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: O_RDONLY, O_WRONLY
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: O_RDONLY, O_WRONLY |
|
Date: |
Sun, 03 Oct 2010 20:18:21 +0200 |
> From: Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2010 10:24:16 -0400
>
> There are O_RDONLY and O_WRONLY conditional definitions in a few files.
>
> They should not be needed on any unix platform and w32.
> Does MSDOS need them? If yes, then it would be better if they were
> moved to msdos.h and removed from all other places.
They aren't needed for MSDOS. The Standard C library used by the
MSDOS build always had these defined on fcntl.h, where they belong.
My guess would be that they are there for some ancient Unix system
that is long gone.