[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default
|
From: |
Deniz Dogan |
|
Subject: |
Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default |
|
Date: |
Thu, 7 Oct 2010 22:54:16 +0200 |
2010/10/7 Drew Adams <address@hidden>:
>> This was discussed briefly a few years ago and Stefan (and other
>> people) agreed with it: how about we map ibuffer to C-x C-b by default
>> in Emacs-24?
>>
>> ibuffer is a superset of list-buffers, and it provides many things
>> that list-buffers does not.
>
> I disagree, for one. And no, it is not a superset.
> But yes, it does provides things that list-buffers does not.
>
Why do you disagree?
--
Deniz Dogan
- binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Dan Nicolaescu, 2010/10/07
- RE: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Drew Adams, 2010/10/07
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default,
Deniz Dogan <=
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Miles Bader, 2010/10/07
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/10/07
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Miles Bader, 2010/10/07
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/10/07
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/10/07
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Miles Bader, 2010/10/07
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/10/07
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/10/07
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/10/07
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/10/07