[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default
|
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
|
Subject: |
Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default |
|
Date: |
Fri, 8 Oct 2010 03:03:28 +0200 |
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 02:29, Miles Bader <address@hidden> wrote:
> Some of the differences are fairly easy to fix -- e.g., list-buffers
> uses whizzy new-style header-line headers, whereas ibuffer uses
> oldskool simple fixed-width headers.
Ibuffer already uses the header line to show filtering status.
Juanma
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, (continued)
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Chong Yidong, 2010/10/09
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Dan Nicolaescu, 2010/10/09
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/10/09
- RE: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Drew Adams, 2010/10/07
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Miles Bader, 2010/10/07
- RE: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Drew Adams, 2010/10/07
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Miles Bader, 2010/10/07
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/10/08
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Chong Yidong, 2010/10/09
Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Juri Linkov, 2010/10/07
Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Deniz Dogan, 2010/10/08