[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Oct 2010 10:30:45 +0900 |
"Drew Adams" <address@hidden> writes:
> Miles, you were the one who proposed previously that we switch `C-x C-b' to
> ibuffer, so this is no surprise.
Yeah and you're the one who complained so endlessly (and voluminously)
the last time, so it's no surprise you're against (the fact that you're
also flogging your personal extensions to list-buffers is a new one though).
But switching to ibuffer is the right thing. Enough with the idiotic
bike-shedding.
[yeah I know, this is emacs-devel, bike-shedding central... but man does
it get tiring sometimes...]
-Miles
--
Quack, n. A murderer without a license.
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, (continued)
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Sergei Organov, 2010/10/08
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/10/08
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Sergei Organov, 2010/10/08
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Chong Yidong, 2010/10/09
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Dan Nicolaescu, 2010/10/09
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/10/09
- RE: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Drew Adams, 2010/10/07
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default,
Miles Bader <=
- RE: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Drew Adams, 2010/10/07
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/10/07
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Miles Bader, 2010/10/07
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/10/08
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Chong Yidong, 2010/10/09
Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Juri Linkov, 2010/10/07
Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Deniz Dogan, 2010/10/08