Re: Testing the gnutls support

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden> writes:

> I think this should be a file of certificates instead, which users can
> encrypt with EPA, or maybe store with the Secrets API.  But that leads
> me back to auth-source.el since it already has this kind of logic in
> it.  WDYT about depending on auth-source.el for GnuTLS interactions?
> I'm divided because OTOH gnutls.el is a low-level wrapper and a
> dependency on auth-source.el will bring in other baggage.

Perhaps auth-source should split the Secrets API stuff out into a
separate library, and then both gnutls.el and auth-source.el could both
use it?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  address@hidden * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen