|
From: | Jan D. |
Subject: | Re: gnutls error handling |
Date: | Sun, 17 Oct 2010 18:21:14 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; sv-SE; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.1.1 |
Eli Zaretskii skrev 2010-10-17 17:22:
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen<address@hidden> Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 15:55:24 +0200 Mail-Copies-To: never poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN}, {fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 2, 0) = 0 (Timeout) select(15, [3 4 8 10 13], [], NULL, {0, 15591}) = 2 (in [8 10], left {0, 15589}) read(3, 0xec9b94, 4096) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN}, {fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 2, 0) = 0 (Timeout) select(15, [3 4 8 10 13], [], NULL, {0, 15532}) = 2 (in [8 10], left {0, 15530}) read(3, 0xec9b94, 4096) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) There's always a gnutls socket involved in the select call -- in this instance it was fd 10. lsof showed the socket to be in the CLOSE_WAIT state. So my suspicion is that the we're somehow now communicating back to Emacs that a gnutls socket has closed.Not really a useful answer, but the `select' man page has this piece of wisdom: Under Linux, select() may report a socket file descriptor as "ready for reading", while nevertheless a subsequent read blocks. This could for example happen when data has arrived but upon examination has wrong checksum and is discarded. There may be other circumstances in which a file descriptor is spuriously reported as ready. Thus it may be safer to use O_NONBLOCK on sockets that should not block. Of course, we already use O_NONBLOCK (AFAIK).
The question is why is Emacs reading fd 3? It is not reported as ready by select, fd 8 and 10 are ready, but those aren't read.
Jan D.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |