Andreas Röhler<address@hidden> writes:
Hi Andreas,
Keeping things easy, it seems preferable to have a working common
footnote first and reflect the use in mails resp. signature issue
afterwards.
I don't get it. The "common" footnote.el works great with email and
signatures, but doesn't recognize existing footnotes when revisiting a
file. org-footnote.el doesn't (yet) handle signatures in mails and
requires some macros and compatibility functions from org, but it
recognizes existing footnotes.
Bye,
Tassilo