[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Server port
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: Server port |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Oct 2010 21:38:19 +0200 |
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 21:29, Leo <address@hidden> wrote:
> I also proposed this in private email to Juanma but was turned down due
> to security concern.
Just for clarification, I didn't "turn down" anything, because the
decision is not mine to make. I likely pointed out that a similar idea
was initially turned down because of security concerns.
Stefan's (couple of years old) message in this thread seems to
indicate that the proposed patch is acceptable.
Juanma
- Re: Server port, Leo, 2010/10/23
- Re: Server port,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: Server port, Stefan Monnier, 2010/10/23
- Remote TCP server through ssh tunnel [Was: Re: Server port], Lluís, 2010/10/24
- Re: Remote TCP server through ssh tunnel [Was: Re: Server port], Ken Raeburn, 2010/10/24
- Re: Remote TCP server through ssh tunnel, Lluís, 2010/10/25
- Re: Remote TCP server through ssh tunnel, Chad Brown, 2010/10/25
- Re: Remote TCP server through ssh tunnel, Stefan Monnier, 2010/10/25
- Message not available
- Re: Remote TCP server through ssh tunnel, Lluís, 2010/10/25
- Re: Remote TCP server through ssh tunnel, Ken Raeburn, 2010/10/26