[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Incorrect merge
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Incorrect merge |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:24:53 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>> This is equivalent to saying that a change on common-fixes could depend
>>> on a change made to emacs-23 only.
>> How do you keep the branch up-to-date?
> AFAIK almost all changes to emacs-23 are eventually merged into
> trunk. This means that common-fixes would containt all changes intended
> to emacs-23, except those few which are not intended for trunk. This
> means that the divergence of emacs-23 from common-fixes will not be
> significant.
Another problem with your branch approach is that a patch applied
(mistakenly) to emacs-23 rather than to emacs-common would end up lost.
It's a lot easier to detect excess patches and lost patches.
Stefan
- Re: Incorrect merge, (continued)
- Re: Incorrect merge, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/02
- Re: Incorrect merge, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/11/02
- Re: Incorrect merge, Stefan Monnier, 2010/11/02
- Re: Incorrect merge, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/11/01
- Re: Incorrect merge, Jason Rumney, 2010/11/01
- Re: Incorrect merge, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/11/02
- Re: Incorrect merge, Andreas Schwab, 2010/11/02
- Re: Incorrect merge, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/11/02
- Re: Incorrect merge,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Incorrect merge, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/11/02
- Re: Incorrect merge, Davis Herring, 2010/11/02