Re: Avoiding replies on emacs-diffs

[Stephen J. Turnbull]

Karl Fogel writes:
 > Reiner Steib <address@hidden> writes:
 > >On Mon, Nov 01 2010, Stefan Monnier wrote:
 > >>> PS could you reply to emacs-devel rather than emacs-diffs in these cases?
 > >>> (I don't know why emacs-diffs is even configured to accept postings
 > >>> other than from Savannah.)
 > >>
 > >> Yes, I get bitten by this all the time.  Indeed emacs-diffs should
 > >> refuse such postings.
 > >
 > >Adding a header "Mail-Followup-To: address@hidden" could help.
 > 
 > Also: just set the 'Reply-to' header on emacs-diffs@ mails to go to
 > address@hidden

Yeah, MFT is just plain beside-the-point here.  (Besides being ignored
by most MUAs in use, and even by a number of popular free software MUAs.)
Reply-To is pretty universally respected.