Re: simple useful functions

[Tak Ota]

Wed, 3 Nov 2010 19:10:28 -0700: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> wrote:

>  > > Uh, what "replace" functionality does "collect-string" provide?
>  > 
>  > I followed your logic as you insist associating this command to occur
>  > which is defined in replace.el.
> 
> Ah.  "Irreconcilable technical differences" raise their heads once in
> again.  In *my* (X)Emacs, occur is defined in occur.el, and that's the
> way it should be. :-)

Ah.  That explains the mutual misunderstanding.  I was wondering why.

-Tak