[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Frame title problem
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: Frame title problem |
Date: |
Mon, 08 Nov 2010 11:45:53 +0900 |
Jan Djärv writes:
>
>
> Stephen J. Turnbull skrev 2010-11-07 15.52:
> > > So I changed Emacs so it lets the X libs set WM_CLIENT_MACHINE.
> >
> > Given the quality of the standard, the only use I can think of is as a
> > heuristic for "readable host name" in frame decorations. If so and
> > the Xlibs will do this for you, this is the Right Thing.
> >
>
> WM_CLIENT_MACHINE is used by managers to kill off bad clients when they
> don't
> respond. It uses _NET_WM_PID and WM_CLIENT_MACHINE to determine if the pid
> is
> local.
Too bad the WM, then, because as you pointed out WM_CLIENT_MACHINE is
not defined in a way that's very useful for that purpose. As a client
property, it could be almost anything. Furthermore, it shouldn't be a
client property; really, this should be transparent to the client, set
in one of the shell widgets.
Anyway, this shouldn't matter to Emacs, Emacs never infloops, right? ;-)
- Re: Frame title problem, (continued)
- Re: Frame title problem, Stephen Berman, 2010/11/05
- Re: Frame title problem, Andreas Schwab, 2010/11/06
- Re: Frame title problem, Stephen Berman, 2010/11/06
- Re: Frame title problem, Jan Djärv, 2010/11/06
- Re: Frame title problem, Stephen Berman, 2010/11/06
- Re: Frame title problem, Jan Djärv, 2010/11/06
- Re: Frame title problem, Stephen Berman, 2010/11/06
- Re: Frame title problem, Jan Djärv, 2010/11/07
- Re: Frame title problem, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/11/07
- Re: Frame title problem, Jan Djärv, 2010/11/07
- Re: Frame title problem,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: Frame title problem, Stephen Berman, 2010/11/08
Re: Frame title problem, Jan Djärv, 2010/11/06