|
From: | Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: | Re: [emacs-bidi] Treatment of LRE,RLE,LRO,RLO,PDF,LRM,RLM |
Date: | Thu, 18 Nov 2010 22:07:20 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> > Cc: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>, address@hidden, > Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> > Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 08:24:57 -0500 > > I largely agree, since it's more in keeping with the Emacs tradition, > but again if digits follow, this is ambiguous: \u123456 (tho this could > also be displayed as \u1234\ 56). I think it's extremely unlikely to have \u1234 followed by 56, and we already have that problem with octal escapes anyway. Also, don't forget that \u1234 is displayed in a special face, which makes it stand out when followed by normal characters.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |