Re: New branch for elpa contents

[Chong Yidong]

Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden> writes:

> Sounds good.  One last question: right now we assume there's just "the
> package repository" but I think we should expect multiple repositories.
>
> Do you want to handle that by making a new branch for each repository or
> by subdirectories for each?  In the former case we'll need an elpa-admin
> branch (for ELLE-related scripts that don't change by repository) and
> the other elpa branches will just have the packages.  The latter case
> requires no extra work now, since we'll add repositories by making more
> directories.  So punting the issue is the same as picking the
> subdirectory option as far as I'm concerned.

Let's punt...