Re: unexpected result with mapc of lambda form inside catch/throw

[MON KEY]

On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Davis Herring <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Can someone please explain why the following expression's `lambda' form
>> returns 32 when mapc'ing its arg X?
>
> Because the second argument to mapc is the " " near the end, and not the
> `sub-str-pfx' just above it?

Davis, thank you so much for helping me to see my erorr!!! :)

I certainly managed to confuse the heck out of myself huh?
Sorry for the noise.

This said, maybe if  `return-from' existed I would have been lest
blinded by my convoluted nesting of catch/throw...

> Davis

--
/s_P\