[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Return
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: Return |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:41:34 +0900 |
Stefan Monnier writes:
> > There are lots of reasons for doing a defun inside of a function.
>
> Give me examples and I'll tell you if I consider them as
> valuable enough.
Anything you would use `require' for inside a function. Betcha find a
dozen or more instances of require-in-a-function in Gnus alone.
> Could be, but that's unrelated: I don't intend to rule out (eval
> `(defun ...)).
How about (eval '(defun ...))?
But the whole idea is gross, Stefan. Please rethink this, at least
until April 1. This is a job for the documentation, not the syntax.
- Re: Return, (continued)
- Re: Return, Miles Bader, 2010/12/06
- Re: Return, David Kastrup, 2010/12/07
- Re: Return, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/07
- Re: Return, David Kastrup, 2010/12/07
- Re: Return, Fren Zeee, 2010/12/08
- Re: Return, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/09
- Re: Return,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: Return, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/09
- Re: Return, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/12/10
- Re: Return, Fren Zeee, 2010/12/23
- Re: Return, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/12/07
- Re: Return, David Kastrup, 2010/12/07
- Re: Return, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/12/07
- Re: Return, tomas, 2010/12/07
- Re: Return, MON KEY, 2010/12/06
- Re: Return, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/12/07
- Re: Return, David Kastrup, 2010/12/07