emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bizarre problem with minor mode defined using define-minor-mode


From: ken manheimer
Subject: bizarre problem with minor mode defined using define-minor-mode
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 19:31:42 -0500

i'm encountering a serious problem with a function created using define-minor-mode - and the problem is only occurring when operating with the byte-compiled version of the function.  i've tried to debug the problem, but am stumped.  i'm able to reproduce the problem in a few versions of emacs, though, and have created a bzr branch on launchpad with a copy of the code.

one of the final steps in my updates to allout.el is migrating allout-mode minor mode to `define-minor-mode'.  however, some key substitutions way deep in my code do only happen properly when i use a explicitly evaluated (via eval-defun or eval-when-compile) version of the define-minor-mode to define the allout-mode function.  if the minor mode was established by a byte-compiled version of the function the same key substitutions do not show in the mode.  (there are some other keybinding problems that occur, as well.)

i wonder whether i'm somehow misusing define-minor-mode in a dumb way, but am entirely missing it if that's the case.

the problem happens identically on the x toolkit and chiba-u versions of emacs, both running on macox X snow leopard:

 GNU Emacs 23.2.91.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin10.5.0, Carbon Version 1.6.0 AppKit 1038.35) of 2010-12-20 on crisp

 GNU Emacs 23.1.90.2 (x86_64-apple-darwin10.4.0, X toolkit) of 2010-11-05 on crisp

i can reproduce the problem by wrapping the define-minor-mode in either `eval-and-compile' or `eval-when-compile' and doing an `emacs-lisp-byte-compile-and-load' to show the different behaviors.  i've created a bzr branch on launchpad.net with a prepared version (details, below) of allout.el for others to try:

  http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ken-manheimer/emacs/alloutdev/annotate/head:/lisp/allout.el?start_revid=102483

in this version i've wrapped the define-minor-mode with eval-and-compile.  that can be changed to test the different behaviors.

when byte-compiling and loading with the eval-when-compile, invoking the mode yields the key substitutions, as it ought.  (of course, the step of loading the byte-compiled code is irrelevant at that point, because the function isn't in the byte-compiled code.  it's only defined because it was evaluated during the byte-compile.)   with the eval-and-compile, loading the byte-compiled allout.elc wipes out the key substitutions - they're no longer in effect.  of course, the lack of the function in the byte-compiled code when using eval-when-compile makes the byte-compiled code useless, so i have no workaround for the problem, just a weird demonstration of it.

i've tried tracking down the failed key substitutions, by wrapping define-key with some advice that noted when the key defines happened, and they do every time the mode is activated, whether or not it's via the byte-compiled version of the mode function (when defined by define-minor-mode).  my function which does the key substitutions (allout-setup-mode-map) uses fset to ensure that the mode map is properly globally established, so it's already kind of complicated.  i'm also wondering whether i'm just misunderstanding something about the way define-minor-mode is supposed to work.

to see the problem, visit this version (see link, above) of allout.el and start allout-mode.  then emacs-lisp-byte-compile-and-load the code, and you'll find that \C-a is bound to move-beginning-of-line, as it normally is - not replaced by allout-beginning-of-line, as it should be.

then change the `eval-and-compile' that's wrapped around the define-minor-mode allout-mode to `eval-when-compile', do emacs-lisp-byte-compile-and-load, and you'll find that \C-a is properly bound to allout-beginning-of-line.  (you can also just manually evaluate the define-minor-mode - that will also the keysubsitutions in the keymap immediately.)

help would be much appreciated!
--
ken manheimer
http://myriadicity.net


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]