[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound? |
Date: |
Sun, 9 Jan 2011 23:00:36 +0100 |
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> IIRC, on Windows all events (*) go to the application first.
Nearly all, but some events are never sent to the application. (At
least not if you are running Windows the normal way.)
An example of a combination that is not sent to the application is
Alt+Tab. (This creates some problems when you are using Alt as Emacs
META. M-TAB is commonly used in Emacs for completion. That does not
work on w32 if you have META on the Alt key - which is default and
actually the only reliable choice in the current (unpatched) Emacs.)
> The
> application usually delegates into a Windows API fallback the handling
> of the events it doesn't know about. So you can handle Alt-F4 on your
> app and do whatever you want, as Emacs does, or delegate into the
> Windows API function (ProcessMessages ?) which performs the standard
> action associated with the event (if any) as 99% of Windows apps do.
>
> IMO, Emacs is doing the right thing, because it allows treating Alt-F4
> as just another key combination. I see no problem binding Alt-F4 to some
> exit function, as long as the user can override that.
I think the binding of Alt-F4 is not that important in a non-multi
document interface (but that is just my opinion).
- Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Deniz Dogan, 2011/01/05
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/01/05
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Deniz Dogan, 2011/01/05
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/01/05
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Deniz Dogan, 2011/01/05
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/01/05
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?,
Lennart Borgman <=
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/09
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/09
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/09
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/09
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Stuart Hacking, 2011/01/12
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/12
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Deniz Dogan, 2011/01/12
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/12
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Chad Brown, 2011/01/12
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Stefan Monnier, 2011/01/12