Re: 3 bugs in Rmail

[Chong Yidong]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

> Maybe rather than mail-bury-function, it could be
> a mail-callback-function, i.e. not meant explicitly for burying but more
> generally for returning to the caller.  I guess the difference would be
> only in the name, tho.

In either case, this probably involves the non-backward compatible
change of adding a new arg to compose-mail and the subsequent
composition functions.

So, my plan is to add the hack from mail-bury to message-bury on the
emacs-23 branch, then work on the cleaner solution on the trunk.