[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound? |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Jan 2011 13:23:48 +0100 |
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 1:06 PM, grischka <address@hidden> wrote:
>> What I really hoped to discuss where the technical difficulties. Emacs
>> does not currently have a way to let key binding fall back to the OS
>> binding. I am not sure it is trivial and I have forgotten the details.
>
> It is nontrivial to say the least.
>
> Unlike XEmacs, GNU Emacs is still a console application at its heart.
> It wants to "read" events in a loop from an input stream until it
> finds them complete as a "key-sequence". No function seems to exist
> that could deal with events that are already read.
>
> So I guess at first you'd need to convert keyboard.c:read_key_sequence()
> from procedural logic into a state machine such that it does not call
> 'read_key()' on its own but instead can be fed with keys one by one.
> Once you have that however you can as well run the Windows backend in
> the same thread and many things become much simpler ;)
The main problem is the state of the default windows message loop. I
think you can overcome that problem using the accessibility API:s but
I do not know the details about that any more.
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Christopher Allan Webber, 2011/01/05
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, grischka, 2011/01/13
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, grischka, 2011/01/17
RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/17